Sea Girt  (732) 974-8898         Middletown  (732) 706-8008

Expanding Estate Recovery

by | Jan 13, 2014 | Medicaid Planning

A recent change to the federal Medicaid Act will permit the various states more freedom when seeking recovery from a personal injury victim’s recovery in a lawsuit.  Currently, pursuant to two decisions of the United States Supreme Court, the various states are limited as to what portion of the lawsuit award they can seek recovery against.

Currently, the states are only able to seek recovery against that portion of the award that compensates the victim for medical expenses he incurred.  The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 will change that effective October 1, 2014, permitting the states to recover against the entire award in a personal injury lawsuit.

To explain what this means, it is best to use an example.  Assume that Mr. Smith is injured in an automobile accident.  As a result of the accident, Mr. Smith incurs significant medical expenses and can no longer work.  Unable to keep up with his medical bills and his general living expenses because he can no longer work, Mr. Smith qualifies for Medicaid benefits.

Medicaid is a health insurance program for needy individuals.  In order to qualify for Medicaid benefits, an individual must have limited assets and income.  Because of Mr. Smith’s situation, he is now a “needy individual” within the meaning of the Medicaid Act and he qualifies for Medicaid.

The Medicaid program pays for a number of Mr. Smith’s medical bills that relate to the injuries he incurred in the accident.

Mr. Smith sues the driver who hit him, hoping to recover the money he lost paying for medical expenses, the money he lost due to missing work, and for his pain and suffering.  Eventually, Mr. Smith wins the lawsuit and recovers $1,000,000.  Of that $1,000,000, $300,000 of the award is allocated to compensate Mr. Smith for the money he lost paying his medical bills, $300,000 is allocated to compensate him for lost wages, and $400,000 is allocated to compensate him for his pain and suffering.

Pursuant to the two decisions of the United States Supreme Court, the state of New Jersey, which paid Medicaid benefits on behalf of Mr. Smith, could only recover against the $300,000 he received to compensate him for the medical expenses he paid.  Since the Medicaid program paid some (or all) of those expenses, the theory goes, the Medicaid program should be permitted to recover against that portion of Mr. Smith’s personal injury award.

The other portions of the award—the portion designed to compensated Mr. Smith for lost wages and the portion designed to compensate Mr. Smith for his pain and suffering—have nothing to do with the Medicaid benefits Mr. Smith received, so New Jersey should not be permitted to seek recovery for Medicaid benefits paid on his behalf against those portions of the award.  Or, so that is what the Supreme Court held.

The new portion of the Medicaid Act permits New Jersey (and the other states) to recover against Mr. Smith’s entire award, including those portions designed to compensate Mr. Smith for lost wages and his pain and suffering.  So, if New Jersey paid $500,000 in Medicaid benefits for Mr. Smith, New Jersey can now (or will be able to effective October 1, 2014) recovery against Mr. Smith’s entire lawsuit award and receive full recovery.

While this sounds good and just, the fact of the matter is, it leaves people such as Mr. Smith, who may need care for the remainder of his life, with little money to pay for that care.  Mr. Smith may need a home health aide or medical equipment, and the less money with which he is left means the less money he has to pay for his care, not to mention his basic living expenses.

Categories

Recent Posts

Do You Really Need a Trust?

When people begin the estate planning process, they often hear that they “need a trust.” The truth is more nuanced. Trusts can be extremely useful, but the right kind of trust depends entirely on your goals, your assets, and your family circumstances. For most people,...

Understanding the Medicaid Five-Year Lookback Period

When someone applies for long-term care Medicaid, one of the most important rules is the five-year lookback period. This rule determines whether the applicant made any gifts or transfers of assets that could delay eligibility for benefits. Despite frequent...

Protecting Your Home from Long-Term Care Costs

For many families, the home is their largest and most meaningful asset. It represents a lifetime of work and is often what parents hope to pass on to their children. Unfortunately, rising long-term care costs put that goal at serious risk. In New Jersey, nursing home...

Living Documents

For more than 26 years, I have practiced elder law in New Jersey. Over that time, I have drafted tens of thousands of estate-planning documents—last wills and testaments, financial general durable powers of attorney, and advance health care directives. These documents...

Gift and Estate Tax: The Boogeyman

Beginning in 2026, the federal lifetime exclusion against gift and estate tax is scheduled to increase to $15,000,000 per individual. In simple terms, this means that a person can give away—or die owning—up to $15 million in assets without paying any federal gift or...

Archives

Additional Articles

To schedule a consultation with the Law Offices of John W. Callinan, call our office closest to you:
Sea Girt  (732) 974-8898         Middletown  (732) 706-8008