Sea Girt  (732) 974-8898         Middletown  (732) 706-8008

Conflict Between Federal and State Law

by | Aug 1, 2016 | Estate Planning

The process of administering the estate of a decedent is, in most instances, quite simple.  For most estates, the executor does not need to retain the services of an attorney.  In fact, with some estates, the last will and testament of the decedent does not need to be submitted to probate because the property of the decedent passes by way of beneficiary designation or to a surviving joint owner.

While most estates are simple, not all estates are.  In fact, some estates can be quite difficult to administer for one reason or the other.  Ironically, sometimes it is the smaller estates that can be the most difficult to administer.  An estate that has insufficient assets to pay the debts of the decedent can be one of the more tricky estates to administer.

If an estate has insufficient assets with which to pay the debts of the decedent, the estate is said to be insolvent.  When an estate is insolvent, there is a certain priority with which the debts of the estate must be paid.  An executor cannot simply pick and choose which debts to pay.

What the typical person serving as executor would most likely do is pay the debts as he receives the bills from the creditors.  The executor would think he was doing a good job and being conscientious by paying bills “right away,” but in fact, such actions could expose the executor to personal liability for failing to abide by the law.

There is a New Jersey statute that governs the priority of debts.  The order in which debts have to be paid is as follows:  funeral expenses, expenses of administering the estate, debts owed to the Office of the Public Guardian, debts with preference under federal or state law, reasonable medical expenses associated with the last illness, debts that have been reduced to judgment, then all other debts.

It is the fourth priority of debts—debts with preference under federal and state law—that I want to focus on today.  To me, a debt with preference under federal law would be any debt owed to the United States government, such as unpaid income taxes.

Now, reading the New Jersey statute, you would think that an executor handling an insolvent estate would be safe in paying the income taxes of the decedent after he paid the funeral expenses and the expenses associated with administering the estate (such as legal bills, executor’s commissions, cost of probate, etc.).  The problem is, there is a conflict between state and federal law on this issue.

A federal statute provides that any debt owed to the United States government takes preference over all other debts.  The federal statute goes on to provide that if the executor of an estate pays any debts before paying a debt owed to the United States and if there is then insufficient assets with which to pay the debt owed to the United States, then the executor is personally liable for the debt owed to the United States.

So, let’s assume the following facts:  Mr. Smith dies with an estate worth $13,000.  His funeral costs $9,000.  His executor is entitled to a commission of $500.  His executor paid $150 to submit Mr. Smith’s Will to probate.  His executor hired a lawyer to file an action to declare the estate insolvent, and the lawyer charged $3,000 to file that action and have the estate declared insolvent.  Mr. Smith owes $2,000 to the IRS and has various other debts some of which have been reduced to judgment.

Now, given the New Jersey statute, you would think the executor would be fine paying the funeral and the costs of administration in full and making a partial payment to the IRS.  But the federal statute says otherwise, and if the executor fails to pay the IRS in full, then the IRS can sue the executor for the remainder of the debt.

Categories

Recent Posts

Do You Really Need a Trust?

When people begin the estate planning process, they often hear that they “need a trust.” The truth is more nuanced. Trusts can be extremely useful, but the right kind of trust depends entirely on your goals, your assets, and your family circumstances. For most people,...

Understanding the Medicaid Five-Year Lookback Period

When someone applies for long-term care Medicaid, one of the most important rules is the five-year lookback period. This rule determines whether the applicant made any gifts or transfers of assets that could delay eligibility for benefits. Despite frequent...

Protecting Your Home from Long-Term Care Costs

For many families, the home is their largest and most meaningful asset. It represents a lifetime of work and is often what parents hope to pass on to their children. Unfortunately, rising long-term care costs put that goal at serious risk. In New Jersey, nursing home...

Living Documents

For more than 26 years, I have practiced elder law in New Jersey. Over that time, I have drafted tens of thousands of estate-planning documents—last wills and testaments, financial general durable powers of attorney, and advance health care directives. These documents...

Gift and Estate Tax: The Boogeyman

Beginning in 2026, the federal lifetime exclusion against gift and estate tax is scheduled to increase to $15,000,000 per individual. In simple terms, this means that a person can give away—or die owning—up to $15 million in assets without paying any federal gift or...

Archives

Additional Articles

To schedule a consultation with the Law Offices of John W. Callinan, call our office closest to you:
Sea Girt  (732) 974-8898         Middletown  (732) 706-8008